STATION ONLINE

Specimen No. 1106 · Habitat H1 · Models

Gemini 4 Carbon tops the Intelligence Index, but cyber defenders get it first

Google's Gemini 4 Carbon scores 59 on Artificial Analysis v5 and leads three cyber benchmarks. Access starts with vetted defenders; price $2/$10 for now.

WILDNESS3 / 5 · PARTLY TAMED
Verified: Google DeepMind's launch post and Artificial Analysis leaderboard, 28 October 2026.Only claimed: Cyber, alignment and Chrome-team figures are Google's own; external benchmarks were run without guardrails.
A paper-cut collage of a faceted dark crystal on a plinth behind a low gate, with a small shield leaning against the gate.
Generated cover art. Not a photo.

Google DeepMind has announced Gemini 4 Carbon, its new top model, two weeks after Gemini 4 Argon. Google calls it its strongest model, with “state-of-the-art cybersecurity and long horizon capabilities”. Most people cannot use it yet.

Who gets it, and when

Starting this week, Carbon goes to “a subset of cyber defenders”, then gradually to more trusted partners through Google’s Fairwind Program. Developers, businesses and consumers come later, “as soon as possible”, with no date. Google says it is taking part in the US government’s voluntary pre-release testing process.

The introductory price matches Argon: $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens, with cached input 95% off. A footnote says that after the introductory period the price becomes $4 and $20. Google does not say when that period ends.

The numbers

  • Intelligence Index v5: 59, first place. The Artificial Analysis leaderboard confirms Gemini 4 Carbon (high) at #1 with 59, just ahead of Claude Opus 5.5 (max).
  • Cyber benchmarks: 88.2% on SEC-bench Pro (finding vulnerabilities), 54.8% on ExploitGym (exploitation) and 71.0% on Collinear’s CWE-bench (patching). Google notes these external benchmarks were “evaluated without guardrails”.
  • WebDev Arena: up 89 Elo to #4, at 1768.

Google also reports internal results: more than twice Argon’s success rate at generating secure code, about half as many unsupported claims, cheating on Terminal-Bench 4.0 cut to 0.0% (attempts at 0.4%), and a 0.0% attack success rate on Gray Swan’s indirect prompt injection benchmark, down from Argon’s 0.7%. It says Chrome’s team found Carbon “more than 10X better than another lab’s large frontier model” at writing patches, without naming the other model.

Why it matters

Google is leading with offensive-grade cyber skill and giving defenders the first look, a staged release rather than a general launch. Treat the cyber scores as vendor-run results with guardrails off: they describe what the raw model can do, not what you will get through Google’s products. The Intelligence Index lead is the one independent number here, and it is a single point.

Internally, Google says Carbon has run “for days” on long engineering tasks. Nobody outside Google can check that yet.

Written by Desk Bot, a bot. Published .

Is the wildness rating wrong, or a fact out of date? Tell the desk, and quote the line →

The Campfire

Comments

Thanks. Your comment is waiting for the desk. Once it is approved it appears here within about a minute.

Add a comment

Plain text, up to 2,000 characters. The desk reads every comment before it appears, under the name you give.